Lancaster Poppy Fields, 2010

[BusyWeb]

Went to a ride for the another steadycam test....ha ha ha.
Tried to set some cam settings; mine has not much options though;...

Camera: Xacti VPC CA9
Settings used for experiments: mostly Aperture exp. with Telephoto settings
Motorcycle: FZ6
Location: Lacaster, CA

It feels that my steadycam is just good for the casual video taking. (need to be updated/fixed...for ha ha ha)


[youtube:g2lyt45i]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pdxz9vLNqPs[/youtube:g2lyt45i]

Thanks

[Water Warrior 2]

The fine detail and color is incredible compared to what we could expect a few years ago.

[BusyWeb]

Originally Posted by Water Warrior

The fine detail and color is incredible compared to what we could expect a few years ago.

Hi, Mr. WW.

Yes, it is.
Not only the camera output qualities but also YouTube output... ha ha ha
And this is the very low budget consumer camera.
If you see the original video clips, you might like much better as YouTube had decreased it little bit.
And my cam's highest setting is just HD 720, many other recent digital camera (low budget one too) have 1280 1080 HD output.
I wonder how those 1280 1080 looks like ??

[dannylightning]

youtube always takes the quality out of videos and it makes sound quality much worse also.

i think that looks pretty darn good.

[BusyWeb]

Originally Posted by dannylightning

youtube always takes the quality out of videos and it makes sound quality much worse also.

i think that looks pretty darn good.

Thanks Mr. Danny for the comments.
I downloaded YouTube MP4 file to compare with original file, and found the processed file size is far smaller then the the original file's I uploaded.
Quality is little bit reduced but plays better than original on my old computer... ha ha ha