03-06-2011, 09:19 AM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 15
|
DOT and Snell
DOT and Snell
I'm a little lost here. I have two full face helments both are DOT rated and one is Snell rated as well. What exactly is Snell? I haven't heard much about it. I was assuming it was another certification kind of like Underwriters Lab. Login or Register to Remove Ads |
|
03-06-2011, 09:32 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Louisville, TN
Posts: 1,413
|
Re: DOT and Snell
Short answer...A hardness test or impact test.
Long answer...Google helmets DOT-Snell. There is more debate on this than it is on which motor oil to use.
__________________
Jerry Truth is there are lots of great bikes available and not nearly as many good riders out there riding them... "A man's got to know his limitations..." |
|
03-06-2011, 09:46 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: P.E.I. Canada
Posts: 3,784
|
Re: DOT and Snell
Snell helmets have to withstand a higher impact & absorb more force than a D.O.T helmet.Generally a Snell approved helmet is more expensive to buy.Most stock car drivers will not wear anything but a Snell approved helmet.
:cool: Login or Register to Remove Ads |
|
03-06-2011, 11:07 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tenerife (Spain)
Posts: 3,719
|
Re: DOT and Snell
Over here, we don't have DOT or Snell. The helmets are just marked CE which means that they comply with European Community regs on the manufacture. Come to think of it, EVERYTHING we buy is marked CE, so DOT & Snell would be rather meaningless, as everything has to be manufactured to the EU specs, & marked CE. That's probably why you can't get Airoh helmets in America - the manufacturers can sell enough in Europe to not be bothered to get them DOT & Snell approved.
__________________
By birth an Englishman, by the grace of God a Yorkshireman. |
|
03-06-2011, 11:09 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
|
Re: DOT and Snell
One way of putting it is that if it's Snell approved...it's DOT approved, but not necessarily the other way around.
__________________
]I am hiding in Honduras. I am a desperate man. Send lawyers, guns and money. The shit has hit the fan. Login or Register to Remove Ads |
|
03-09-2011, 11:17 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: HoCo, Maryland
Posts: 1,349
|
Re: DOT and Snell
Yea, like JWR says, just Google it please and you'll see.
I have a full face helmet but the front flips up, so it's only DOT approved, not Snell.
__________________
2005 "Saturn Black", stock + tach |
|
03-10-2011, 01:25 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Squamish B.C Canada
Posts: 11,409
|
Re: DOT and Snell
Very few if any flip ups are Snell Approved for a couple reasons. First, the manufacturer has to lay out some big change for the testing and right to use the label if they pass the test. Second, the Snell Foundation just hasn't got around to testing flip up hats yet.
There has been some discussion for the past few years as to whether the Snell standards may be too severe for moto riders. Meaning the Snell hats are too robust and do not have enough give when suffering an impact at normal riding speeds. So unless you plan on impacting a wall at 140 mph you probably won't need it. Of course at 140 the rest of the body is just so much hamburger anyway. DOT helmets will do just fine when it counts. As per usual, here it my plug for ATGATT. Protect your joints and hard parts. Hands, feet, elbows, knees, shoulders, hips. You get the picture. |
|
03-10-2011, 05:32 AM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tenerife (Spain)
Posts: 3,719
|
Re: DOT and Snell
Quote:
__________________
By birth an Englishman, by the grace of God a Yorkshireman. |
|
|
03-11-2011, 06:11 PM | #9 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Hot Springs Arkansas
Posts: 1,127
|
Re: DOT and Snell
Quote:
Here in Hot Springs, they wear half-helmets, AKA brain buckets, for that same reason.
__________________
"Tell me what kind of wreck you're going to have and I'll tell you what type of helmet you need." [Author Unknown] |
||
|
|
|