11-16-2016, 04:13 PM | #12 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 5
|
Quote:
Did something change after 2000 that makes you prefer it? Why is the 2000 model very easy to service compared to newer ones? |
|
|
11-16-2016, 10:15 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Shannon, Georgia
Posts: 1,268
|
Well, I'd love to tell you that I researched all available options before I bought my GZ, but the
truth is I was looking for a small bike and someone had a GZ for sale within driving distance at the right price and with low miles, so that's what I bought. Now, having said that, I was very happy with the GZ, it got mileage in the 70's for me and was easy to handle and had the appearance of a larger bike, I learned to adjust the valves and all the other maintenance on it and I never had any mechanical problems with it. I've never owned either the Yamaha or the Honda 250 but I have ridden the Honda and it was significantly smaller and didn't fit my 6'1" frame well. Other than that, I can't think of anything bad to say about any of the three, they are all well built machines that should give you good service and no major problems and they probably each have some area where they outperform the other 2 but I doubt if there's a lot of difference performance wise from any of them. Login or Register to Remove Ads |
|
11-17-2016, 02:25 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Squamish B.C Canada
Posts: 11,409
|
We shouldn't forget to add the Suzuki GW250 into the mix. It is very modern and well built in China with Suzuki quality control requirements.
|
|
|
|