Go Back   GZ 250 Forums > General Motorcycle-Related > Other Models/Manufacturers

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-19-2010, 07:28 PM   #31
Easy Rider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Champaign, Illinois
Posts: 4,561
Re: Lightweight yet more powerful bike?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete7874
That Shadow looks pretty nice actually. 2.9-gal tank? How many miles do you get before you hit reserve?
In town, I figure 100; highway, 120.
Either way, my bony butt can't stay in the sadddle more than 2 hours at a stretch anyway.
__________________
Loud pipes risk rights!



Login or Register to Remove Ads
Easy Rider is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2010, 12:20 AM   #32
Water Warrior 2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Squamish B.C Canada
Posts: 11,409
Re: Lightweight yet more powerful bike?

Yup, I can relate to Broken Butt Syndrome. After 90 minutes I need a stretch, a smoke, coffee and a walk around or different seat in a coffee shop. Older riders can't dredge up reserves like we used to. Another bonus is we get to talk to fascinating folks along the way.
Water Warrior 2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2010, 09:26 AM   #33
dhgeyer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Merrimack NH USA
Posts: 722
Re: Lightweight yet more powerful bike?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Water Warrior
Yup, I can relate to Broken Butt Syndrome. After 90 minutes I need a stretch, a smoke, coffee and a walk around or different seat in a coffee shop. Older riders can't dredge up reserves like we used to. Another bonus is we get to talk to fascinating folks along the way.
:plus1: :2tup:
__________________
54 HD Hummer,64 Honda150,66 Ducati250,01 Vulcan500,02 Vulcan1500,83 Nighthawk650,91 K75,95 VLX,04 VLX,01 GS500E,01 Ninja250, 02 Rebel,04 Ninja500,06 Concours,96 R850R



Login or Register to Remove Ads
dhgeyer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2010, 04:00 PM   #34
frempath
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 40
Re: Lightweight yet more powerful bike?

Personally my preferred bike would be 4 cylinder, shaft driven, fuel injected, with an old universal japanese motorcycle seating set up, probably in the 650-750 range.
Why?
4 cylinder - I have an old wrist injury that is very vibration sensitive, so more cylinder keeps the hand from going numb as quickly.
Shaft - having owned both chain and shaft, I like the feel of a shaft, lower maintenance, less noise.
Fuel injected - less fussy with outdoor conditions.
UJM set up - What can I say, its what I prefer.
650-750 - I want a nice utility bike. One that will easily run errands around town, commute, and go for an all day ride in the county.

So why do I have a GZ? Hey a free bike that runs errands about town for a couple bucks a week is hard to beat, especially when the alternative is the bus.

Now if Honda starts importing the CB1100 or the Hornet to north america.....

frempath
__________________
frempath

The older boy's GZ250 for about town.
Previous:
XJ 650
GS 450L
XJ 650
XS 650
TS 185
ATC 90
frempath is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2010, 05:41 PM   #35
alanmcorcoran
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 2,926
Lightweight yet more powerful bike?

Re bony butt syndrome... Had numb ass on the Honda Aero after 60 odd miles. However, same ass can go 500 miles on the Strat no prob. Conversely, no neck upper or lower back issues on the Honda but a problem after about an hour or two of highway on the Strat. Might not be your ass but the bike (or seat) that is the problem.
__________________
[hr:5yt6ldkq][/hr:5yt6ldkq]
http://alanmarkcorcoran.com Motorcycles, Music, Musings and More…



Login or Register to Remove Ads
alanmcorcoran is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2010, 05:49 PM   #36
dhgeyer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Merrimack NH USA
Posts: 722
Re: Lightweight yet more powerful bike?

Quote:
Originally Posted by frempath
Personally my preferred bike would be 4 cylinder, shaft driven, fuel injected, with an old universal japanese motorcycle seating set up, probably in the 650-750 range.
Why?
4 cylinder - I have an old wrist injury that is very vibration sensitive, so more cylinder keeps the hand from going numb as quickly.
Shaft - having owned both chain and shaft, I like the feel of a shaft, lower maintenance, less noise.
Fuel injected - less fussy with outdoor conditions.
UJM set up - What can I say, its what I prefer.
650-750 - I want a nice utility bike. One that will easily run errands around town, commute, and go for an all day ride in the county.

So why do I have a GZ? Hey a free bike that runs errands about town for a couple bucks a week is hard to beat, especially when the alternative is the bus.

Now if Honda starts importing the CB1100 or the Hornet to north america.....

frempath
Except for the fuel injection you just described the Honda Nighthawk 650 as produced from 1983 to 1985. Those years only. Four cylinder shaft drive UJM, 6 speed with lots of features that would still be considered advanced today, like an LCD display including the gear you're in. No FI, though. If you ever see one of those with low miles in good condition, you might want to take a look.
__________________
54 HD Hummer,64 Honda150,66 Ducati250,01 Vulcan500,02 Vulcan1500,83 Nighthawk650,91 K75,95 VLX,04 VLX,01 GS500E,01 Ninja250, 02 Rebel,04 Ninja500,06 Concours,96 R850R
dhgeyer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2010, 06:37 PM   #37
alanmcorcoran
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 2,926
Re: Lightweight yet more powerful bike?

I think Moedad has something like that...
__________________
[hr:5yt6ldkq][/hr:5yt6ldkq]
http://alanmarkcorcoran.com Motorcycles, Music, Musings and More…
alanmcorcoran is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2010, 07:40 PM   #38
Easy Rider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Champaign, Illinois
Posts: 4,561
Re: Lightweight yet more powerful bike?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dhgeyer
Except for the fuel injection you just described the Honda Nighthawk 650 as produced from 1983 to 1985.
And the Kaw Eliminator 600, around that same time.
Ninja racing powered; really quick.
And a low seat too.
__________________
Loud pipes risk rights!
Easy Rider is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 04:10 AM   #39
Water Warrior 2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Squamish B.C Canada
Posts: 11,409
Re: Lightweight yet more powerful bike?

Frempath, you might want to consider something with a 90 degree V-twin. They are easily one of the best balanced smooth power plants available. Vstroms, SVs and the Gladius all have a nice smooth delivery with the Gladius being the most UJM of the 3. The only drawback is the chain drive. A belt on the Galdius would be super.
Water Warrior 2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2010, 05:01 PM   #40
Pete7874
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 65
Re: Lightweight yet more powerful bike?

Quote:
Originally Posted by greenhorn
I'm not positive, but I have heard that they may phase the 500 out of production...which , if you are set on getting one might work in your favor price- wise. They'll want to get the 2009 s out the door.
That's what I've heard too - no Vulcan 500 for 2010. Supposedly it would need fuel injection in order to pass the latest emissions requirements. This means more expensive bike, and Kawasaki doesn't think they'd sell enough of them at this higher price point.

In any case, I am looking for used ones... 2008 maybe.
__________________
Pete7874 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.