12-01-2007, 11:56 AM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Champaign, Illinois
Posts: 4,561
|
Quote:
IMHO: With a 16T front, it makes 5th gear (even more) an overdrive. This is only a problem if you use 5th gear in a stressful situation, like uphill, with a heavy load or at high speed. So..........if your riding habits are such that you seldom (try to) use 5th gear under one of those stressful conditions, then you should be OK. More specific to your question: A heavy load should not be a problem ***IF*** most of your riding is on streets and roads that are flat and have a speed limit of 55 or less.
__________________
Loud pipes risk rights! Login or Register to Remove Ads |
|
|
12-01-2007, 03:07 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Squamish B.C Canada
Posts: 11,409
|
I had thought about a 16T on Happy Hobo's GZ but it runs so well here in the twists and mountains I think it would be counter productive. It does seem to be geared well for this terrain and can accelerate well past 60 MPH uphill in 4th. I guess if it ain't broke I won't fix it. Besides, she said "NO". lol.
|
|
04-30-2008, 12:18 PM | #13 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Orangeville, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 21
|
suzuki Noob
Being a Suzuki Noob this might seem like a stupid question.
but going from a final drive ratio of 2.73 to a ratio of 2.56 seems like big jump for a small displacement bike. would it make more sense to change the front and rear sprockets at the same time to something like 16/42 for a final ratio of 2.62, or to 15/40 for a final ratio of 2.66? and shouldn't the weight of the rider have a large impact on what that bike will be able to do at those ratios.?
__________________
Dave Rood 2001 Kawasaki Vulcan 800 Classic 2003 Suzuki Marauder GZ 250 Orangeville, Ontario. Login or Register to Remove Ads |
|
04-30-2008, 01:04 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Champaign, Illinois
Posts: 4,561
|
Re: suzuki Noob
Quote:
As for the final ratio: It depends on your objective, as well as your circumstances. My objective (which I believe is representative of most riders of the GZ) was to improve the ride-ability below 55 mph......with a minimum of hassle and expense. For me (small person, not much highway riding and NO Interstate) it worked out perfectly. For others, it may not. If you go back and review the threads here, I "think" all of my posts included a caution that it may not be appropriate for: Large riders, two-up or lots of freeway use. I still think that is true. It also may not be appropriate for a rider who thinks the GZ is a sport bike instead of a cruiser !!
__________________
Loud pipes risk rights! |
|
|
04-30-2008, 01:54 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: toronto ont canada
Posts: 177
|
16 t sprocket
Hey rudeboy
you are correct that by raising the gear ratio you will add more load to the machine and maybe exceed it's pulling capability. I also have a 250 hoda 3 wheeler that although it has very low gearing has seemingly much more pull than the marauder 250. That is all as you indicate as a result of gearing. If you have more power then decreasing the gear ratio makes sense for more top speed etc.
__________________
sds4 Login or Register to Remove Ads |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|