07-24-2008, 12:43 AM | #81 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Orlando, FL, USA
Posts: 38
|
Good luck with the Cheng Shin tires. I just did not believe anyone was actually going to be able to get them to me in the near future so I went with the Kenda's (wrong size front). Anyway here's what I paid for my order from www.chaparral-racing.com if anyone's interested. They didn't have the rear tube so I bought that at a local shop. I placed the order on Thursday, 7/3/08 and received it Thursday, 7/10/08.
328-7340 1 1 46.85 WILL SHIP 100/90 16 Front K671 Cruiser S 328-7360 1 1 49.85 WILL SHIP 130/90 15 K671 Cruiser ST 337-0164 1 1 5.99 WILL SHIP 90/100-16/350 16 TUBE 317-0114 1 1 1.25 WILL SHIP 14" Rim Strip 317-0116 1 1 1.25 WILL SHIP 16" Rim Strip Merchandise Net: 105.19 Tax Amt: 0.00 Shipping Amt: 0.00 Total Amt: 105.19
__________________
2003 Suzuki GZ 250 - stock Login or Register to Remove Ads |
|
07-24-2008, 09:55 AM | #82 |
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Dalton, GA
Posts: 3,996
|
Not the wrong size... just alternate.
|
|
07-24-2008, 05:59 PM | #84 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Bucks Co. PA
Posts: 361
|
YEA!
Tirescheap came through and I received my cheng shins today. I purchased new tubes and rim strips locally. Whew! :cool:
__________________
The real money in a gold rush is in supplying liqueur and women to the miners.... May the wind always be at your back and the sun overhead as you make your way down the ever winding, smoothly paved, traffic free road! |
|
07-25-2008, 06:03 PM | #86 |
Senior Member
|
I'm still holding out for the stock size CS front tire. I was looking at other sizes though and am thinking out loud. Some here have gotten 100/90-16 and I thought the 120/80-16 might make a decent alternative size as well. From the miata tire calculator page:
Specification Sidewall Radius Diameter Circumference Revs/Mile Difference 110/90-16 3.9in 11.9in 23.8in 74.8in 848 0.0% 120/80-16 3.8in 11.8in 23.6in 74.0in 856 -1.0% Specification Sidewall Radius Diameter Circumference Revs/Mile Difference 110/90-16 3.9in 11.9in 23.8in 74.8in 848 0.0% 100/90-16 3.5in 11.5in 23.1in 72.5in 874 -3.0% Looks like the 120/80-16 would be a better choice. just my 2 cents |
|
07-25-2008, 07:02 PM | #87 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Crawfordville, Florida
Posts: 2,853
|
As I said on a previous post here (I also started this string), I got the 120/80 front Cheng Shins, listed as the 906 tire, from the local Suzuki dealer who ordered them from somewhere in California, and there is no appreciable difference in riding on them compared to the 110/90 's. The tires are almost identical to the original specs and I don't think any experienced rider could tell one from the other. The only thing that seemed strange to me was that the front and rear tread patterns from this 906 and the 907 I got, both Cheng Shins, is reversed, and I will post a picture later when I get out to the bike with my camera. If the 120/80s are the only thing available, I would go for them.
|
|
08-07-2008, 05:50 PM | #89 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Crawfordville, Florida
Posts: 2,853
|
The picture posted previously suggesting the front wheel is not centered on the axle is an optical illusion. If you look at the bike from the front, the brake disk fills the space on the right side of the wheel whereas on the left side there is nothing. The wheel is centered if you want to measure it from the forks on each side.
|
|
08-11-2008, 06:50 PM | #90 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Melbourne, Florida
Posts: 119
|
Re: Cheng Shin Tires
Quote:
__________________
Just reboot it, you'll be fine. |
|
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|