View Single Post
Old 07-02-2008, 08:31 AM   #3
jonathan180iq
Super Moderator
 
jonathan180iq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Dalton, GA
Posts: 3,995
I was thinking that too, but the final drive ratios would end up being so close to that of the 15/41 standard combination.

15/41 - 2.73
16/41 - 2.56
16/42 - 2.63
16/43 - 2.69

If a change of .17 made that much a difference in the top end, then moving that back to .10(16/42) should be somewhere in the middle. I think that at a difference of .5(16/43) the variation from the standard 15/41 wouldn't be great enough to justify all of the extra work required with the new rear sprocket install.



Login or Register to Remove Ads
jonathan180iq is offline  
Reply With Quote