![]() |
irratic idle
hey, guys. got an issue that has been nagging on the wife's GZ for a while now. The idle is all over the place. I'd think it was a vaccum leak, but there really isnt one. I finally got a replacement choke cable in, so I replaced it. The bike was completely unridable before this. With no tach, I could only guess it wanted to idle around 2500-3000 rpm. Mainly due to the choke, I know. I went ahead and pulled the carb and broke it down. i cleaned the whole thing out. There was some ugly residue that came out, but only a very small amount. The only place where there was any real evidence of gumming up was... guess... the "choke". (more of a manual enrichment....) I also did a valve adjustment. the top end was horribly noisy. well. i got the exhaust right, but I dont have the smaller gage for the intake... so I guessed at it. It ain't perfect, but its a LOT better than before.
Now. The idle is whacky. if youre cruising and slow down, you can tell that it doesnt return all the way down. after you come to a stop, the idle hangs a tad high. drag the clutch and it comes down and stays there. if you rev it a little, sometimes it eases back down, sometimes it hangs up there a bit. its more annoying than a hazzard to riding or damage. All the vent lines are routed like they should be, includeing the "fuel pump" vaccum line to the fuel valve. Any thoughts? thanks! Billy |
Re: irratic idle
First, I must give you my "I'm not a mechanic" disclaimer (I'm sort of the opposite.) Second, I had the same problem as you. I was unable to fix it myself (not that I tried very hard - but I did pull the plug, mess with the idle setting, put Seafoam through, etc.) I took it to my dealer three times before they fixed it. They claimed they cleaned the carb each time, but if I had to hazard a guess, I'd say there are degrees of cleaning a carb, and my problem required that you REALLY, REALLY, REALLY clean the carb. It is also possible that something was hosed in the emissions canister, The valves needed adjustment, or something else was tweaked, but I really think the problem was something clogged in one or more of the jets in the carb.
The good news is, they did fix it on the third try - this was over a year ago - and it's been running great ever since. Idles consistently and not high. Bike is very quiet and very steady once warmed up (five minutes or so.) Before it was fixed, it would rev super high and also stall - annoying and dangerous to ride. I burned a nice hole in some expensive touring pants pushing the thing out of an intersection. If I hadn't had the pants on the hole woulda been in my leg. Plus, all the effing around with it while you are riding uses up the parts of your focus that help you avoid getting killed. Good luck. There are carb experts on here - I am certain they will all weigh in. Take all of the advice, and add it up and divide by the number of posts. |
Re: irratic idle
Quote:
How about sticky throttle cables ? I'd run some carb cleaner through with the gas. Sometimes that gets "places" that you can't see with a manual cleaning. |
Re: irratic idle
Quote:
:2tup: :) |
Re: irratic idle
Quote:
:lol: thats funny... the throttle cables are fine. when the idle hangs, i can twist the throttle a little harder closed. it goes no farther than it was and has no effect. the airbox is nice and clean. drain is clean as well with the cap in place. air filter is spotless. as for the valve adjustment, i've got to order a gage with the right thickness. mine doesnt go that far down. the one i have was actually a couple hundredths of a milimeter thicker than called for, but i adjusted it tighter than i normally would have, but in any case the same amount of tension was achived in inserting/removing the gage. once i get the right gage, i'll be taking her apart and readjusting the valves. i'll put it into perspective. when I took it apart, a .003" feeler gage slid right in there. :shocked: 80% of the topend noise is gone now. should be resolved 100% once i get the new gage in. i haven't tried the fuel mixture. i looked it up once, but I didnt drill the plug out. might be my next adjustment along with shimming the needle. |
Re: irratic idle
Quote:
:roll: :cool: |
Re: irratic idle
Lynda must have been very fortunate with her GZ. The bike would sit for months at a time in the winter and fire up perfectly in the spring. Never had any fuel stabilizer or fuel additives at all. Carb was untouched from factory settings and only the idle was turned up a bit for the first few spring rides. Must be a Canadian thing eh.
|
Re: irratic idle
Quote:
|
Re: irratic idle
I thought the U.S. and Canadian models were the same.
|
Re: irratic idle
Does Canadian gas contain ethanol? I think that is a big contributer to the gumming, but others will disagree.
|
Re: irratic idle
Quote:
According to the news the U.S. is considering 15% ethanol and Canada will probably follow suite. Should be interesting when some one pumps that into a high compression engine by mistake. FI might compensate somewhat but a carb will be out of it's league. |
Re: irratic idle
If the US is considering 15% that means it will be a done deal in the near future.
|
Re: irratic idle
Quote:
That's probably why the European / Canadian tank logos are the same, & different to the American logos - to tell the Canadian / American bikes apart. |
Re: irratic idle
Quote:
The proposal is NOT for all the gas sold but for ANOTHER mix with 15% that is approved for use ONLY in 2007 (I think) and later model year vehicles. AND retailers will not be requires to carry the new mix (yet). That means, probably, that one of the present 3 "grades" of fuel will have to go to make a tank and pumps available for the new stuff. Adding new tank and pumps probably won't happen because of cost. My guess is that the "mid grade" will disappear and be replaced by E-15. |
Re: irratic idle
Thanks Easy. It's all in the details. Probably the mid grade will go away as you say or the gas outlets will need another underground tank.
|
Re: irratic idle
that will be a logistics nightmare.
something of note... relating to gas. i receive a newsletter on british touring cars. (got a MG in pieces) one of the articles was about the ethanol mix. "shelf life" is around 45 days. after that, the fuel mix separates between the alcohol (bottom) and gasoline (top). The can be accelerated by water.. even from condensation. IIRC, it said that 2 tbs of water will cause accellerated separation and contamination of the fuel. then you get water (bottom) alky (middle) and gas (top). honestly, i doubt that alcohol will gum up a carb. its actually more "pure" than gasoline and leaves fewer deposits as it evaproates or breaks down. |
Re: irratic idle
mine idled messed up and it was the plunger on the choke cable sticking, took it apart, lubed up the cable it and it ran fine.. problem fixed
|
Re: irratic idle
to clear this topic...
i did remove the cap to adjust the air/fuel mixture. mine was already at 2.25 turns. maybe because it was a "sea level" bike? i bought it in Lakeland, Fl and we live in S.GA... not really enough change in elevation to worry about. we're at around 300ft MSL. anyway, i rotated it out an extra 1/4 turn to 2.5 turns. idle issue resolved. cold start is easier, even on a weak battery. thx for the tech, guys. :) oh, btw... i run 91/92 octane in the 250, same as my Ninja. |
Re: irratic idle
Quote:
It has been discussed to death, here and elsewhere and the consensus IS that not only is it a waste of money but in some cases might make the engine run WORSE. |
Re: irratic idle
i run it because the engine is air cooled and doesn't have the thermal control of a water cooled engine. higher octane fuels are more resistant to knock/detonation. while the engine is a tad below what "requires" a higher octane rating, i have found that the bike tends to run more reliably with higher octane fuel. this is my experience based on fillups over the past couple of years.
oh, its also "easier to fuel both bikes at one pump and pay one fee rather than "insist" on putting 87 in there and pay a separate tab. if it would run on diesel and i chose to put that in there, what difference would that make? my bill. dispite the good tech in here, i'm starting to feel less and less at home. :retard: |
Re: irratic idle
Quote:
|
Re: irratic idle
Quote:
:2tup: :) |
Re: irratic idle
Quote:
What does it take for you to "feel at home" ? |
Re: irratic idle
Quote:
|
Re: irratic idle
[quote=Water Warrior]
Quote:
Come on yourself. I've been treading just about as lightly as I can lately without letting "stuff" just go by completely. It was an honest question......as was the first one as to why he mentioned it in the first place. I got an honest and useful answer to the first question......except for the "less and less at home" comment. Just exactly who IS it that is taking an offensive posture......and why do YOU feel a need to stir things up even more ??? |
Re: irratic idle
b1pig - This forum is made up of all sorts, a cross section of the population, with different opinions and different ways of expressing those opinions. A few of us might appear a bit 'gruff' at times, and it does occassionally lead to a bit of a flaming war, but not so much lately. I think everyone here wants to help each other solve their problems and get along the best we can. Stay with us, even if it means ignoring the occassional comment that rubs you the wrong way.
|
Re: irratic idle
Quote:
What are you, the thread policeman or something, Why can't you just let "stuff" go by completely? That statement is just ridiculous, its like you think it is your job to "police" The GZ250bike forum, well guess what, its not. Last time I checked you didn't create this site nor are you an Administrator of this site, so why don't you just chill out. Of course now I have done more to assure that b1pig is going to leave the site by degrading her thread even further (sorry b1pig, please don't leave), but something had to be said to the "GZ site cop" :lol: . |
Re: irratic idle
whether i leave or go is beside the point. every forum has its own demographic. For example, two forums that i take part in regularly... one is run on a "PG13" level, as its considered a "family" board. The other, not so polite. i can deal with what comes. the point is that -for the most part- this forum seems to be mostly laid-back types. which is cool. i'm not into the flame happy junk. however, if poked, i will poke back.
easyrider. if you have a suggestion or comment to make, make it. i have not been a member of this forum for that long of a time, but if my mere comment of running premium fuel in a bike which does not require it gets your blood pressure up... its on you. the fact that i choose to run a fuel which EXCEEDS Suzuki's suggestion is my choice and it surely is NOT going to harm the bike. I said I run premium, as .. in dealing with "other" forums when working through a fuel related tuning issue, that has often been brought up. i'm not here to insult anyone's intelligence. there are people out there that know far more than me, and i have been wrong on more than one occasion myself... recently in fact. if i did know it all, i most certainly would not be on this forum asking questions. my experience with motorcycles is limited, but i'm far from uneducated on general automotive maintenance and fully understand the internal combustion engine. most topics on use of a particular fuel or octane rating is weighted HEAVILY on opinion. some choose to. some follow manufacturer's recommendation. some dont. some drive a car that "requires" 91 or higher octane on 87 and never has a problem with it. i just did a search in this forum. i see that one of your posts related to how adding ethanol increases the octane rating. ok. so... if youre pumping 87, is it 87 counting the ethanol's effect or "87+". it would seem that the 87 rating is what they're going to make it for. so, if adding the ethanol accounted for points, youre actually runnin 85 ocane + ethanol. have you considered fuel separation/breakdown? shelf life for gasoline hovers in the 45 day range, but that can be complicated by humid environments. addition of small amounts of water (as little as 2tbs) can contaminate the fuel and start early separation. also... alcohol (ethanol) ABSORBS water. (here's a helpful PROFESSIONAL website to confirm these facts: http://www.fuel-testers.com/ethanol_eng ... tions.html) my theory is... the bike doesnt get ridden as much as i'd like. therefore, considering that there is ethanol in the fuel, it WILL breakdown at some point. WHEN it breaks down, will i be left with 87 octane or 85 or less because of the alcohol? if i drain contaminants out of the tank and ride it away, will the fuel left in the tank.. though with less ethanol.... be ok to run? will it cause engine damage? these things concern me, because when the problem strikes, i may not be at home. besides that, each time that we put 87 octane in her GZ, the engine has exhibited some occasional knock under hard acceleration on particularly hot days. and, as stated... since my wife and i often ride together and my bike needs higher octane fuels (lighly modified 2000 ZX7), fueling up together at the same pump is less of a hassle. plus, we can see how petty of an expense this hobby is for us compared to other hobbys. |
Re: irratic idle
You go b1pig. Very well put.
|
Re: irratic idle
Quote:
So, one at a time: It is interesting and useful, maybe, to hear a new perspective on the gas/octane discussion. Thanks for that. You still haven't answered the question about why you "feel less and less at home". If you are going to drop these little "bombs" you should be prepared to explain them. I've got a sneaking hunch, given the experience that you claim with forums, that you knew EXACTLY what the expected result was of your little "jabs".......as is reinforced by adding "premium gas" to your sig. I will try harder to ignore the bait in the future. |
Re: irratic idle
Quote:
Would you rather have a forum where anybody could say anything, no matter how ridiculous and outrageous it is.......and that nobody would make any attempt to correct it or ask for a clarification ??? I wasn't upset. It now appears that b1pig really wasn't either. If you were, I'm sorry; get over it. Seems like I remember YOU disagreeing with a few posts along the way. Are you going to stop that too ??? |
Re: irratic idle
Quote:
And I never claimed that I don't disagree with people in my life or on this site, sometimes needlessly, but disagreeing with someone and saying that "I've been treading just about as lightly as I can lately without letting "stuff" just go by completely" and attacking someone for simply stating that they use premium fuel and that they may leave the site because they are "starting to feel less and less at home" are two totally different things. If you go by just that statement and attack, one would think that you are the ruler of this site, that you make the rules, that you are some kind of "big dog" around here, and the truth is, YOU ARE NONE OF THOSE THINGS! You really need to go see a doctor Easy, one day you seem like a totally agreeable, likable fella, then the next you seem like some sort of deranged, mean, Berryman's B12 Chemtool employee. That is called Bi-polar disorder and they have medication for it, I suggest you look into taking some. |
Re: irratic idle
Quote:
AND I wasn't the one who said ANYTHING about leaving the site. I asked two legitimate questions and have received legitimate answers......so far. There may be some bi-polar action going on here but I don't think it is with ME. Lighten up a bit, please. Maybe you should consider taking your own advice. |
Re: irratic idle
Quote:
Easy Rider Said "And you felt a need to mention that.........WHY ?? It has been discussed to death, here and elsewhere and the consensus IS that not only is it a waste of money but in some cases might make the engine run WORSE." That is attacking someone who said absolutely NOTHING to YOU. That person did not say "hey Easy Rider you D@#khead, I use Premium Fuel", so you had no reason whatsoever to go on the attack. And no one said you said ANYTHING about leaving the site, so on top of being Bi-polar it appears you are getting senile to go with it. I said you attacked someone for saying they may leave because they are feeling less and less at home here. AND on top of that, you went on the attack on Water Warrior for what? ASKING YOU VERY NICELY to chill out on the newer members and actually complimenting you in the process. So you can say whatever you want about me to deflect attention away from the real issue here, that YOU need to chill the hell out, and quit attacking and belittling people that YOU PERCEIVE are not as intelligent as you are. Every time someone calls you out for doing this shit, you act like it is the first you have heard of it, knowing good and well that HANDFULS of people have complained about you and TO you about this same old crap, yet you continue to do it time and time again. So now if you want to complain about an issue that has been BEATEN TO DEATH on this site, then this is it, the issue of YOU EASY RIDER, being mean, nasty, rude, and just overall an inconsiderate human being has been beaten to death on this site (well actually on SEVERAL SITES), so how about you quit doing it so we can actually talk more about motorcycles and less about your mental illness's. I am done discussing this with you in this thread, if you want to discuss it any further, start a new thread in the appropriate section, or send me a P.M. |
Re: irratic idle
Easy Rider.
I didn't consider your comment an attack, however i did feel that the comment was confrontational in nature. i'm not in the habit of being a poo-flinger, nor do i stir the pot. not intentionally. cheers |
Re: irratic idle
Quote:
If that is NOT the case, then what WAS the point of making those open-ended statements in the first place ??? I can't figure any other reasonable explanation. The little jab in your sig seems especially "in your face", in light of the present discussion. |
Re: irratic idle
Quote:
Nothing I have done is nearly as disruptive, mean, nasty or rude as the posts YOU have left in this thread. Not even close. I once again suggest a little introspection and taking your own advice. |
Re: irratic idle
I apologize for letting Easy get the better of me and dragging this argument out as long as I did in this particular thread, I especially apologize to b1pig for basically ruining this thread, I will try harder in the future to respond in the appropriate section (which I have now done) to begin with instead of letting it run amok like this.
|
Re: irratic idle
Please, stop running off the n00bs.
b1pig, please stick around. You seem reasonable enough to deal with the occasional riff-raff. |
Re: irratic idle
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:34 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.